Duck Creek Swing Bridge


Click the photo to view the full-size version

1/34
Date Taken:
Author:
Caption:

Name Duck Creek Swing Bridge
Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge #1500
Built By Chicago & North Western Railway
Currently Owned By Canadian National Railway
Superstructure Contractor American Bridge Company of New York (Lassig Plant) (Main Span)
Unknown (Approach Span)
Substructure Contractors Unknown
Length 142 Feet Total, 113 Foot Main Span
Width 1 Track
Height Above Ground 15 Feet (Estimated)
Superstructure Design Through Plate Girder and Steel Stringer
Substructure Design Stone Masonry
Date Built 1904, Approach Added c. 1910
Traffic Count 5 Trains/Day (Estimated)
Current Status In Use
Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge Number 1500 (Old #4)
Canadian National Railway Bridge Number 1500
Significance Moderate Significance
Documentation Date 9/27/2014; 10/8/2022

In 1864, the Peninsula Railroad of Michigan (PRM) constructed 62 miles of new railroad, extending from Escanaba, Michigan to Negauee, Michigan.  The PRM had originally been charted to connect the iron mines of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan to Lake Michigan at Escanaba.  After completion of the line, the PRM would be purchased by William B. Ogden, and consolidated into the Chicago & North Western Railway (C&NW).  This segment of line was originally disconnected with the rest of the C&NW system, which was beginning to expand in Wisconsin.  A 5 mile extension to Ishpeming, Michigan was constructed in 1870 by the C&NW.  In 1870, the C&NW constructed an additional 50 miles of railroad, extending from the end of the existing mainline at Green Bay, Wisconsin to Marinette, Wisconsin, on the Michigan border.  The following year, a bridge would be constructed over the Menominee River, and an additional 64 miles of railroad constructed to Escanaba. This line soon became a major mainline for the C&NW, allowing the shipment of iron ore from the Upper Peninsula and allowing the construction of branch lines.  North of Escanaba, numerous branch lines would be constructed to serve the mines of the area.

By the early 20th Century, the C&NW had constructed and acquired a large railroad network throughout the Midwest, making it one of the premiere railroads of the area. Throughout the first half of the 20th Century, this line remained critical for the C&NW, as it provided connections to a number of lines throughout northeast Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. The line served a variety of industries, hosted passenger trains and was heavily used for hauling iron ore.  The C&NW was acquired by Union Pacific Railroad (UP) in 1995.  UP soon began to sell or abandon excess tracks acquired from the C&NW.  The line from Green Bay to Ishpeming and the remaining mine branches were sold to a subsidiary of Wisconsin Central, Ltd. (WC).  In 2001, WC was purchased by Canadian National Railway (CN), and became the American subsidiary of the railroad.  Today, CN continues to operate the line between Green Bay and Gladstone, Michigan as the Marinette Subdivision, and the Gladstone to Ishpeming segment as the Ore Subdivision.


Located near Duck Creek Junction in Howard, this unique through plate girder swing span carries the former Chicago & North Western Railway mainline over Duck Creek. In the 19th and early 20th Century, Duck Creek was considered a navigable waterway as far inland as present-day Velp Avenue. The first bridge at this location likely consisted of a wooden truss swing bridge, constructed when the line was first built. In 1879, the main span was replaced by a 112-foot wooden Howe pony truss swing span, likely set onto a timber pile pier. In addition, the main span was approached by timber pile trestle spans, which were last renewed in 1894. In the first years of the 20th Century, the C&NW invested significant capital into this line, replacing aging timber bridges with stone and steel structures. Plans were developed for a new steel swing span in late 1903, and a new through plate girder swing span was installed on stone substructures in 1904. It is believed that the original northern approach consisted of timber pile trestle spans. This approach was replaced by a steel stringer span in approximately 1910, giving the bridge its present configuration. Currently, the bridge consists of a 113-foot rim-bearing through plate girder swing span, approached by a 29-foot steel stringer span. The entire bridge is set onto stone substructures.

The through plate girder span is one of two identical spans fabricated for the C&NW in 1904, with the other located at Oconto, Wisconsin. These spans both use a variation of a standard heavy through plate girder design, with massive girders, curved girder ends and a traditionally composed floor. The swing span uses a rim-bearing design, where the superstructure is placed onto a metal drum, which rotates on a roller nest set onto a geared track. The drum was turned by a gear system, which used the geared track to turn. The ends of the spans were lifted by a standard wedge-style block, which was controlled by an external metal rod placed onto small rollers. The swing span was operated by using a T-shaped key, which turned the gear system and activated the wedge end lifts. The approach span uses a standard design, with shallow steel stringers. Typical of swing spans, the center pier consists of a round design, while the approach pier uses a diamond shaped design. Both abutments use a standard design, with stepped wing walls extending diagonally from the structure. Stone for the substructures consists of a white limestone, likely quarried at the Duck Creek Quarry immediately south of this bridge. This quarry supplied high quality limestone for bridges and buildings throughout much of the eastern portion of the C&NW system. American Bridge Company fabricated the swing span at their Lassig Plant in Chicago, while the approach span was fabricated by an unknown contractor. The substructures were also constructed by an unknown contractor. Through plate girder spans were commonly used by railroads, as they were durable and easy to construct. These spans were also ideal for small swing spans, as they were simple to design. Since the initial construction, the bridge has seen a number of alterations. The northern pier has been repaired with concrete, and the original end lift mechanisms have been removed from the structure. Overall, the bridge appears to be in fair to good condition, with no significant deterioration noted. A significant amount of strike damage is present on the swing span, likely due to a shifting load or derailment in the 20th Century. The author has ranked this bridge as being moderately significant, due to the swing design.


Citations

Build date and builder (main span superstructure) Chicago & North Western Railway Drawing Collection at the Chicago & North Western Historical Society Archives
Railroad History Citation ICC Valuation Information, Compiled by Richard S. Steele

Loading...