Name | IM Sangamon River Bridge (Springfield) |
Built By | Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway |
Currently Owned By | Illinois & Midland Railroad |
Superstructure Contractor | Unknown |
Substructure Contractor | Gould Construction Company of Davenport, Iowa |
Length | 747 Feet Total, 198 Foot Main Span |
Width | 1 Track |
Height Above Ground | 20 Feet (Estimated) |
Superstructure Design | Subdivided Warren Through Truss, Steel Stringer and Timber Pile Trestle |
Substructure Design | Concrete, Steel Pile and Timber Pile |
Date Built | 1954 |
Traffic Count | 2 Trains/Day (Estimated) |
Current Status | In Use |
Significance | Local Significance |
Documentation Date | 2/17/2024 |
In 1888, the people of Pawnee, Illinois financed the Pawnee Railroad (PR), which constructed a railroad line from their town to the Illinois Central Railroad (IC) mainline south of Springfield. This junction point would become known as "Cimic". In 1905, the Chicago Edison Company purchased the PR for the purpose of transporting coal from the coal fields in central Illinois to Chicago. The new railroad would be organized as the Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway (C&IM). The following year, the C&IM reconstructed the Pawnee to Auburn portion of the line, and built a 16 mile extension to Taylorvile. Owned by Samuel Insull, the company would be reorganized as Commonwealth Edison in 1907. In 1294, the company acquired the Springfield-Havana-Pekin segment of the former Chicago, St. Louis & Peoria Railway. Coal transfer facilities were constructed on the Illinois River at Havana and Pekin, further increasing the importance of this line.
The portion of the line between Cimic and Auburn was abandoned in 1957. After the Clean Air Act was passed in the 1960s, the high sulfur content of coal from the area made the use of this coal impractical. Mines along the route began to close, and the C&IM was offered for sale, but received no takers. During the 1970s, Commonwealth Edison changed plans, and began constructing power plants in central Illinois along the C&IM, sending electricity to Chicago along high voltage lines. By the 1980s, deregulation of the railroads allowed Commonwealth Edison to use competitive bidding to obtain coal, and the C&IM would be placed for sale. The C&IM was sold to investors in 1987, and the railroad eventually became part of the Illinois & Midland Railroad (I&M); owned by Genesee & Wyoming, Inc. Today, the I&M continues to operate the line between Cimic and the Kincaid Generating Station; while east of there the line is out of service but largely intact to Taylorville.
Located on the north side of Springfield, this large through truss bridge carries the former Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway over the Sangamon River. The previous bridge at this location was a long timber pile trestle, supported by timber bents. Because of the close spacing of the bents required by this type of bridge, the bridge was a flood hazard, and by the mid-20th Century, the railroad decided to replace the structure. In 1954, a large portion of the timber trestle would be replaced by the current bridge. Currently, the bridge consists of a 198-foot, 8-panel, riveted subdivided Warren through truss span, set onto concrete piers. The truss span is approached by two 30-foot steel stringer spans on the north, and five 30-foot steel stringer spans on the south. In addition, a portion of the timber trestle was rebuilt to approach the south steel spans. The approaches are supported by steel pile and timber pile substructures. It is currently unknown what contractor fabricated the superstructure, and Gould Construction Company completed the substructure. The truss span is heavily constructed, using a modified X-frame portal bracing and rolled members. The floor of the main span is traditionally composed, using stringers and floorbeams. Subdivided Warren trusses became popular in the 1920s as a stronger version of the popular Warren through truss. The additional members greatly increased the load carrying capacity of these spans. Since the 1954 construction, the bridge has seen little alterations. Overall, the bridge appears to be in fair to good condition, with no significant deterioration noted. The author has ranked this bridge as being locally significant, due to the newer age.
Citations
Builder and build date | Railway Age; Volume 136, Issue 13 |
Railroad History Citation | ICC Valuation Information, Compiled by Richard S. Steele |