Name | DREI Lake Decatur Bridge Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Bridge #133 |
Built By | Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railroad |
Currently Owned By | Decatur & Eastern Illinois Railroad |
Superstructure Contractors | Unknown (Main Spans) McClintic-Marshall Corporation of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (West Span) Smith Bridge Company of Toledo, Ohio (East Span) |
Substructure Contractor | Unknown |
Length | 310 Feet Total, 73 Foot Main Spans |
Width | 1 Track |
Height Above Ground | 15 Feet (Estimated) |
Superstructure Design | Deck Plate Girder |
Substructure Design | Concrete and Timber Pile |
Date Fabricated | 1889 (East Span) c. 1915 (Main Spans) 1922 (West Span) |
Date Erected | c. 1915 (Main Spans) 1922 (Approach Spans) |
Original Location (East Span) | Unknown |
Traffic Count | 2 Trains/Day (Estimated) |
Current Status | In Use |
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Bridge Number | 133 |
Significance | Moderate Significance |
Documentation Date | 10/21/2023 |
In 1873, the Indianapolis and Illinois Central Railway Company (I&IC) constructed 85 miles of new railroad, extending from the Wabash River near Hillsdale, Indiana to Decatur, Illinois. In 1875, the company began construction an additional 68 miles to Indianapolis, Indiana. The I&IC would become part of the Indianapolis, Decatur and Springfield Railway (ID&S) in 1875, and the ID&S would complete the line. The ID&S became part of the Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway (ID&W) in 1887, which was reorganized into the Indiana, Decatur and Western Railway (ID&W) in 1895. In 1901, the Springfield & Decatur Railway (S&D) would construct an additional 26 miles from Boody, Indiana to Derry Farm, Indiana and the ID&W would construct 8 miles from Derry Farm to Springfield, Illinois. The railroad was reorganized into the Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railway (CI&W) in 1902, and was again reorganized into the Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railroad in 1915. The CI&W operated a sizable network throughout Indiana and Illinois.
In 1927, the CI&W would be acquired by the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad (B&O). The B&O was a prominent railroad, operating lines throughout the eastern United States. This line provided the B&O with an additional connection into Illinois, serving Decatur and Springfield. Throughout the 20th Century, traffic along the route began to decline.
The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway (C&O) took financial control of the
B&O in 1963. In 1973, the two railroads were merged into the
Chessie System, although they continued to operate separately. The portion of the line between Decatur and Springfield was abandoned in 1984. In 1987, the Chessie System was merged into CSX Transportation. This route was an excess line for CSX, which already operated parallel routes with more local traffic. In 1988, the line between Russellville and Bloomingdale would be abandoned, followed by segments between Indianapolis and Roachdale in 1989; Roachdale and Russellville in 1990; Bloomingdale to Montezuma in 1994 and Montezuma to Hillsdale in 2001. In 2018, CSX sold the Decatur to Hillsdale line to the Decatur & Eastern Illinois Railroad (DREI), the current operator of the remaining line.
Located on the east side of Decatur, this deck plate girder bridge carries the former Baltimore & Ohio Railroad over Lake Decatur along US Route 36. Little is known about the history of this bridge. It is believed that the first bridges at this location were likely constructed of timber, and possibly were timber truss bridges. In the late 1880s, a number of upgrades were made to this line, and it is believed that this bridge was replaced by an iron truss bridge. This bridge lasted until approximately 1915, when it would be replaced by three deck plate girder spans, set onto concrete piers and approached by timber pile trestle spans. In 1922, the timber approaches would be replaced by an additional deck plate girder span on either end. As part of the 1922 reconstruction, a secondhand span was reused from an unknown location for the east span. This reconstruction was likely completed in response to the impounding of the Sangamon River to form Lake Decatur, which was completed that year.
Currently, the bridge consists of three 73-foot deck plate girder spans, a 40-foot west approach span and a 50-foot east approach span. The four piers of the bridge are constructed of concrete, while the abutments are both constructed of timber piles. All of the deck plate girder spans use a traditional design, with heavy girders connected by interior bracing. The three main spans are heavier than the outer spans, likely due to the longer length. It is unusual for steel spans to use timber abutments. However, this design may have been chosen due to the close proximity of the The three main spans were fabricated by an unknown contractor, and the concrete substructures were constructed by another unknown contractor. The west span was fabricated by the McClintic-Marshall Corporation, and appears to have been installed new at this location. The east span was fabricated in September 1889 by the Smith Bridge Company, and was reused from an unknown location. None of the spans appear to have had any significant modifications since they were installed here.
Railroads often reused steel spans, as it provided a cost effective way to upgrade bridges on branch lines without requiring significant amounts of new material. Typically, these steel spans were repaired prior to being installed. It is likely that the east span was reused from a location in Indiana or Ohio, and was probably constructed during the large bridge upgrade programs in the late 1880s. Because the span was installed in 1922, it is likely that the span was originally fabricated for the C&IW. It is unknown if this span came from a single structure, or was part of a multiple span structure. The Smith Bridge Company was not known to have constructed a large amount of railroad spans, and instead seems to have primarily focused on roadway spans. Since the 1922 reconstruction, the bridge appears to have remained largely unchanged. Overall, the bridge appears to be in fair to good condition, with no significant deterioration noted. The author has ranked this bridge as being moderately significant, mainly due to the age and builder of the eastern span.
Citations
Builder and build date (east span) | Smith Bridge Company plaque |
Builder and build date (west span) | McClintic-Marshall Corporation Plaque |
Railroad History Citation | ICC Valuation Information, Compiled by Richard S. Steele |