Name | Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge #335 |
Built By | Chicago & North Western Railway |
Currently Owned By | Private Owner |
Superstructure Contractor | Unknown |
Length | 20 Feet Total |
Width | 1 Track (92 Feet) |
Height Above Ground | 15 Feet (Estimated) |
Superstructure Design | Stone Arch |
Substructure Design | Stone Masonry |
Date Built | 1887 |
Traffic Count | 0 Trains/Day (Bridge is Abandoned) |
Current Status | Abandoned |
Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge Number | 335 |
Significance | Local Significance |
Documentation Date | 11/27/2014 |
Located north of Mankato near the Le Sueur County line, this large stone arch carries the former Chicago & North Western Railway over Lime Valley Creek alongside County Road 5. The first bridge here was likely a timber pile trestle. In the late 19th Century, the C&NW Throughout the late 19th Century, the C&NW sought to replace timber pile trestles along this line with permanent embankments and bridges. The current structure was built in 1887, and consists of an 20-foot stone arch, constructed at a width of 92 feet. The bridge uses a typical design, with a semicircular arch and wing walls extending diagonally from the structure. A large embankment was once located above the bridge, but has been mostly removed. The bridge is constructed of high quality stone blocks, likely quarried near Kasota. An unknown contractor completed the structure. Since the initial construction, the bridge has seen little alterations. It has been abandoned since 1954, when the railroad was removed between Kasota and Burdette. Stone arches were often constructed to replace trestles, due to the durability and ease of construction. Overall, this bridge appeared to be in fair to good condition at the time of documentation, with minimal significant deterioration noted. The author has ranked this bridge as being locally significant, due to the common design.
Built in 1887, this 20-foot stone arch likely replaced a timber trestle. Stone arches such as this were popular with the C&NW, due to the durability and ease of construction. Oftentimes, an arch like this would be constructed under the trestle, and the trestle simply filled with earth. Overall, the bridge appears to be in fair to good condition, with minimal significant deterioration noted. The author has ranked this bridge as being locally significant, due to the common design.Citations
Build date | Date carving |
Railroad History Citation | ICC Valuation Information, Compiled by Richard S. Steele |