Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge #335


Click the photo to view the full-size version

1/10
Date Taken:
Author:
Caption:

Name Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge #335
Built By Chicago & North Western Railway
Currently Owned By Private Owner
Superstructure Contractor Unknown
Length 20 Feet Total
Width 1 Track (92 Feet)
Height Above Ground 15 Feet (Estimated)
Superstructure Design Stone Arch
Substructure Design Stone Masonry
Date Built 1887
Traffic Count 0 Trains/Day (Bridge is Abandoned)
Current Status Abandoned
Chicago & North Western Railway Bridge Number 335
Significance Local Significance
Documentation Date 11/27/2014

In 1864, 50 miles of new railroad was completed from Winona to Rochester, Minnesota by the Winona and Saint Peter Railway (W&StP). The following year, an additional 55 miles was completed to Waseca. The Chicago & North Western Railway (C&NW) would purchase a controlling stake in the W&StP in 1867. Construction would continue in 1870, with an additional 11 miles completed between Waseca and Janesville. The following year, 23 additional miles were opened to Mankato, followed by 30 additional miles completed to New Ulm in 1872. 62 more miles were completed to Tracy, Minnesota in 1879.
From Tracy, the route would be continued westwards in 1879, with numerous branch lines built off the main line. In 1900, the Mankato & New Ulm Railway (M&NU) would complete a new route, 26 miles in length between Mankato and New Ulm. This new line bypassed the old line, which used two large iron bridges to cross the Minnesota River. The W&StP and M&NU would be consolidated into the C&NW in June 1900. The C&NW operated this route as the main line of the Dakota Division, eventually operating the passenger train the "Dakota 400" over the route. Because the original line between Mankato and New Ulm was not considered necessary, the line was abandoned in stages. The first segment abandoned was between Burdette (Mankato) and Kasota, followed by the Kasota to St. Peter segment in 1957. The line was further abandoned between St. Peter and Traverse in 1963, and between Traverse and the New Ulm Quarry in 1970.
As the line became less profitable in the 1970s and 1980s, the C&NW was considering abandoning the route. In 1986, the line between Winona and Rapid City, South Dakota would be sold to the Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad. The DM&E would be purchased by Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) in 2008. In 2023, CP merged with Kansas City Southern to form Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited, commonly known as CPKC. CPKC continues to operate the Waseca to Tracy segment as the Tracy Subdivision.

Located north of Mankato near the Le Sueur County line, this large stone arch carries the former Chicago & North Western Railway over Lime Valley Creek alongside County Road 5. The first bridge here was likely a timber pile trestle. In the late 19th Century, the C&NW Throughout the late 19th Century, the C&NW sought to replace timber pile trestles along this line with permanent embankments and bridges. The current structure was built in 1887, and consists of an 20-foot stone arch, constructed at a width of 92 feet. The bridge uses a typical design, with a semicircular arch and wing walls extending diagonally from the structure. A large embankment was once located above the bridge, but has been mostly removed. The bridge is constructed of high quality stone blocks, likely quarried near Kasota. An unknown contractor completed the structure. Since the initial construction, the bridge has seen little alterations. It has been abandoned since 1954, when the railroad was removed between Kasota and Burdette. Stone arches were often constructed to replace trestles, due to the durability and ease of construction. Overall, this bridge appeared to be in fair to good condition at the time of documentation, with minimal significant deterioration noted. The author has ranked this bridge as being locally significant, due to the common design.

Built in 1887, this 20-foot stone arch likely replaced a timber trestle. Stone arches such as this were popular with the C&NW, due to the durability and ease of construction. Oftentimes, an arch like this would be constructed under the trestle, and the trestle simply filled with earth. Overall, the bridge appears to be in fair to good condition, with minimal significant deterioration noted. The author has ranked this bridge as being locally significant, due to the common design.


Citations

Build date Date carving
Railroad History Citation ICC Valuation Information, Compiled by Richard S. Steele

Loading...